The election was a resounding win for President-Elect Trump and provides him with a clear mandate to change federal energy policy. His ability to implement policies is further supported by the fact that the Republican party now controls the Senate and may control the House of Representatives. In light of this historic shift, we have provided a short summary of the likely energy policy changes to be implemented by the Trump Administration and their impact on energy prices. While our position has been that the outcome of the election will not significantly affect near-term prices, there are factors that may influence prices in the long term.

With temperatures starting to cool down and the days shortening by almost two minutes per day, it seems like the summer might be in the rearview mirror.  With the clarity of hindsight, we thought a market review across the regions and the ISOs for the summer would be appropriate.

Figure 1. Mean Temp (F) ending Sept 30, 2023, by NOAA      Figure 2. Mean Temp (F) ending Sept 30, 2024, by NOAA

Since weather is one of the biggest short-term drivers of electricity demand and volatility, let’s start with a quick look at the difference between the last two summers compared to the 30-year averages, according to the National Weather Service. 

In late August, we wrote that while the result of the Presidential election will have a significant impact on Federal energy policy, it will not materially affect energy prices. We now have a somewhat clearer understanding of Vice President Harris’ energy policy, and we continue to maintain that while several Biden climate initiatives are at risk, the election will not significantly impact near-term energy prices. In fact, as recently noted by The Economist, “Green subsidies will probably survive Mr. Trump’s re-election, and Big Oil will probably do just fine under Ms. Harris.”[1]

Below, we break down a few of these key energy policies and explain why most are not actually in play.

As we approach the end of August, the focus of the summer typically begins to shift towards things like kids returning to school, parents seeking a more normal schedule, the excitement and optimism of each football team’s upcoming season, and hopefully milder temperatures across our power grids.

Given this, we thought it would be appropriate to give a quick update of how the summer has played out so far, by region and commodity (gas and power).

The departure of President Biden and the nomination of Vice-President Harris challenges anyone predicting the impact of the 2024 election on energy policy. Unlike President Biden or former President Trump, both of whom have clear track records on energy policy, Vice-President Harris has said almost nothing to-date about her administration’s approach to the energy market or climate change. In her speech accepting the Democratic Party’s nomination, Vice-President Harris did not use the word “energy,” and there was only a single reference to climate change – that we need “[t]he freedom to breathe clean air, and drink clean water and live free from the pollution that fuels the climate crisis.” President Trump’s stance on energy-related policies is better known, and we expect his administration will take regulatory action to help coal, natural gas and nuclear power to better compete with renewables.  Notwithstanding this policy shift, our view is that a second Trump administration will not have any significant effect on near-term energy prices. Electricity and natural gas market fundamentals and the overall balance of supply and demand will likely be the main drivers of energy prices over the next six to twelve months regardless of who wins the election in November. 

The good news is that we now know the price of capacity through May 2026. The bad news is that capacity prices have increased by approximately 5x over the last auction. The surge in price was fueled by power plant retirements, rising regional demand, and regulatory requirements seeking to address the participation of renewables and how much capacity they can provide during periods of system stress. Before examining the details of this latest auction, it’s important to review how the capacity market got to where it is today. As a refresher, the PJM Interconnection operates the largest competitive wholesale electricity market in the United States, serving 65 million people across 13 states and the District of Columbia as shown in Figure 1. Its primary function is to coordinate the flow of power and develop market rules such that the system operates reliably and safely. A critical component of PJM's operations is its capacity market, which ensures long-term reliability by securing sufficient resources to meet future electricity demand.